The Racial Conundrum
One reason often cited by some to justify racial profiling is that non-whites are more likely to break the law because they form the largest percentage of prison inmates.
The counterpunch to this tired logic is that non-whites are disproportionately represented in our penitentiaries as a result of racial profiling in the first place. If whites which represent about 72 percent of the US populution are profiled as much as others, the numbers would probably be different.
Put differently, if non-white citizens enjoy the same type of treatment as white counterparts, their inmate population would decline, and with it would go the usual argument of "propensity to commit crime" often used against those profiled.
There is no gain-saying the fact that those who are more likely to be searched and arrested would form the largest chunk of prison inmates. If a non-white is searched merely beacuse he is not white and in the process illegal substances are found on him, he would be arrested - not because he is not white, but because of his possession of such illegal substances. On the other hand, if similar substances were in the possession of a white citizen, because he is less likely to be searched, he might never be arrested for the same crime. Whites are not less likely to commit crimes; they are merely less likely to be arrested even if the same actions would necessarily lead to the arrest of non-whites.
It thus begs the question why anyone would be surprised at the high level of crime among non-white population, and especially in non-white communities. It is racial profiling, stupid!
